The Supreme Court of India declined to hear a plea seeking urgent intervention regarding police actions against student protesters. The incident occurred during a demonstration led by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) at Jantar Mantar on Wednesday. The students protested against the alleged NEET-UG 2026 paper leak, which has caused widespread discontent among students and educational circles.
This plea received its first hearing before a Bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant. The petitioner’s counsel emphasized the importance of the matter, requesting prompt attention from the court.
In response to the request for an urgent hearing, Chief Justice Kant firmly commented, “Don’t waste our time, and don’t waste your time.” This statement highlights the court’s stance on expediting hearings, which often come under scrutiny for their importance.
The lawyer detailed the nature of the protests, focusing on the NEET-UG 2026 paper leak and the urgency for reforms within the National Testing Agency (NTA). As the protests gained momentum, the situation escalated, prompting significant public interest.
When the counsel brought up videos that supposedly captured the police’s response to the protesters, Chief Justice Kant responded succinctly, “We are not interested in videos; we don’t have time to watch.” This remark underscores the court’s priority to streamline its caseload without delving into unverified media.
The Supreme Court bench ultimately did not entertain the request for swift hearing. This development follows a similar ruling from the Delhi High Court, which also refused an urgent hearing concerning police actions during the protests. Such decisions signify a broader judicial approach to managing petitions and prioritizing case loads.
The CJP has fervently protested against the alleged NEET-UG 2026 paper leak, insisting on the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan and multiple reforms within the examination system. The protests escalated to a march towards Parliament, during which clashes erupted between students and police forces, leading to accusations of excessive force.
The Supreme Court’s observations were specific to the urgency of the request and did not provide any ruling regarding the underlying allegations made in the plea. The court’s decision may signal its position on prioritizing judicial resources amidst the continuing public debate surrounding education and examination integrity.
